When should an agent ask for help?

I’m Vicky Feliren, an applied scientist interested in decisions under uncertainty. I study when an agent should act, gather more evidence, or ask for help.

Read the research View the CV
Vicky Feliren
Vicky Feliren
8 Publications 3 journal articles, 4 conference papers, and 1 preprint, including 3 as first author.
5+ years Industry and freelance ML Work across employed roles and freelance projects, including models for finance and city services.
1 Issued patent A method that passed formal examination and became an issued patent.
12 Awards & scholarships Including the Asia-Pacific regional award at the Global South AI Safety Hackathon.
100+ Researchers co-led with Experience coordinating research across a large international group.
1000+ Students taught & judged Experience explaining difficult ideas to people seeing them for the first time.

Background

At Jakarta Smart City, I forecast municipal waste. Later, at GDP Labs, I built banking models. At Monash, I studied flood and mining maps from satellite images. Alongside this work, I help build Southeast Asian datasets with SEACrowd.

These settings shaped my interest in how uncertainty should influence a decision.

View the full CV

Research interests

Each choice an agent makes changes what it encounters next. Therefore, I want to study whether uncertainty estimates remain reliable across a whole task.

I’m interested in how changes in inputs, models, and error costs affect these decisions. I also want to test whether internal model signals help identify when an answer needs review.

See my work and next questions

Each choice changes the next decision.

A navigation agent reaches an unfamiliar junction.

Evidence and decisions form a sequence Available evidence informs the next step. That step changes later evidence, which informs the next decision. Available evidence Choose the next step Later evidence Later evidence informs the next decision. Evidence and decisions form a sequence Available evidence informs the next step. That step changes later evidence, which informs the next decision. Available evidence Choose the next step Later evidence
  • Act

    The agent enters a corridor. Its next decision depends on what it sees there.

  • Gather evidence

    The agent inspects its surroundings. It gains more observations before choosing a corridor.

  • Ask for help

    The agent pauses for guidance. Its next decision uses the additional instruction.

Recent work · Updated September 2026

  • I posted ENCP, a preprint on coverage guarantees across whole vision-language navigation routes.
  • I contributed to CommonLID, a web benchmark for 109 languages published at ACL 2026.
  • I presented my multilingual vision-language abstention study at AI Safety India's Hackathon Winners event.

I write about how uncertainty estimates support decisions and when their assumptions fail. For example, the essay below asks when a model should withhold an answer.

Knowing when you don't know is the core safety property

When an agent should stop, gather evidence, or hand a decision back to a person.

Read the essay →
Featured in The Business Times

AI rules in SEA: the risks, the fines, what you need to know

Featured coverage of new AI rules, enforcement risks, and compliance duties across Southeast Asia.

Read in The Business Times →

Contact

My research direction is sequential decision making under uncertainty. I welcome collaborations on how agents act, defer, or gather evidence as conditions change. I am also open to applied scientist roles and speaking invitations.

Research Collaboration Research & Applied Roles Speaking Mentorship
Get in touch →